Tehran’s sequenced negotiation plan puts war’s end before nuclear discussion. Mid East media with the report. The framework represents Tehran’s most detailed public articulation yet of the conditions under which it is prepared to re-engage diplomatically, and it sets a deliberately high bar for entry.
The first phase is narrowly defined and non-negotiable in scope. Tehran wants the war brought to a halt and binding guarantees secured that hostilities will not resume, covering both Iran and Lebanon. Until that is achieved and formalised, Iran has made clear it will not entertain discussions on any other subject. The insistence on guarantees for Lebanon signals that Tehran views any settlement as necessarily linked to the broader regional picture, not just its own territory.
Should phase one produce an agreement, the framework moves to a second stage centred on the Strait of Hormuz. This would address the waterway’s management arrangements, with Oman playing a key coordinating role in developing a new legal framework for the strait. Given the Hormuz blockade’s significant impact on global energy supply, this phase carries considerable economic weight and would be closely watched by oil markets.
The nuclear question — long the central preoccupation of Western governments and a primary driver of the original conflict — is relegated to phase three. Iran has been explicit: the nuclear file will not be opened until satisfactory outcomes are secured in the first two stages. This sequencing appears designed both to protect Tehran’s negotiating leverage and to ensure any nuclear discussion takes place from a position of relative security rather than under the pressure of active conflict.
Whether Washington accepts the framework as a basis for resuming talks remains to be seen. The phased structure effectively asks the United States to make significant concessions upfront — including a ceasefire and security guarantees — before the nuclear issue, which has been the primary US concern, even reaches the agenda. That asymmetry is likely to face scrutiny in Washington and could prove the central sticking point.
—
Tehran’s structured, sequenced approach introduces a new layer of complexity into the negotiations. By ring-fencing the nuclear file until the final phase, Iran is effectively extending the timeline to any comprehensive resolution, keeping sanctions relief and a lasting energy market normalisation some distance away. For oil markets, the Strait of Hormuz remaining a phase-two discussion rather than an immediate priority means supply disruption risk lingers
