She was careful to frame a hike as conditional rather than imminent, but the conditions she cited, above-potential growth and rising inflation risks, are not remote scenarios given the current environment.
Paulson described the labour market as currently feeling like full employment, a positive assessment of underlying economic strength, but added an important qualification: the stability of the job market right now is unusual. The comment carries an implicit warning that the Fed does not regard current conditions as a reliable guide to what lies ahead, particularly given the pressures building from the Middle East conflict. She said directly that if the Iran conflict persists, it would further increase risks to both inflation and unemployment, a stagflationary combination that leaves policymakers with no straightforward policy response. Higher rates address inflation but deepen unemployment risk; holding or cutting addresses growth but risks inflation becoming entrenched.
On process, Paulson said she saw no need to alter the Fed’s policy language at the most recent meeting, suggesting the existing framework remains adequate to communicate the current stance. She also touched on artificial intelligence, noting it is still early days in understanding how AI might affect productivity and inflation, an area the Fed is watching but where it is not yet in a position to draw firm conclusions.
The June meeting, the first under incoming Fed Chair Kevin Warsh, will be closely watched for any sign of whether the hawkish shift now clearly visible among regional Fed presidents reflects the direction the new chair intends to set.
—
Paulson’s characterisation of risks as “super-elevated” on both sides of the Fed’s dual mandate is a significant escalation in language from a voting member, and will reinforce the market shift away from pricing cuts toward pricing hikes. The explicit acknowledgement that a rate increase might be warranted if growth moves above potential or further inflation risks emerge puts a hike firmly within the Fed’s stated reaction function, not just a tail risk. The observation that current labour market stability is “unusual” is a subtle warning that conditions may not remain this benign, and that the Fed is aware of the fragility beneath the surface
